Don't you hate it when you discover a new author you really like, and it turns out she's dead?
I don't suppose this happens too much to people who've recently fallen in love with someone like Dickens. Even an inattentive reader is probably going to guess that he lived in the 19th century. The style is all wrong for a modern novelist, and all that attention to detail just seems a little
too perfect, you know? Besides, eventually they'll stumble across an edition that mentions his bio on the back or has a foreword that fesses up that the guy died.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f562/4f5622df0e4b4b5e2822f65f219234eaf366dfab" alt=""
There are all sorts of pitfalls to modern novels, though. Unless you're someone willing to risk spoiling a book by looking up the author on Wikipedia ahead of time, you never know who you're dealing with. You might be sitting in the Barnes & Noble café cheerily chatting up a stranger about this new writer you've discovered, and they could turn to you and say, "You know that guy got arrested for being a pedophile, right?" To borrow an analogue from music, imagine how teenagers who'd just gotten into the Who felt after raving about
Who's Next when someone told them Pete Townsend got arrested for Googling little girls.
The worst thing, of course, at least in terms of reader satisfaction, is finding out the author died. With Dickens, you know to pace yourself. If you race through
The Pickwick Papers, nothing's going to change the fact that you now have ten books left. Sure, there's the rare chance that an author'll pull a Tupac and have a bestseller long after they've croaked — Camus'
The First Man comes to mind — but after over a century you can be pretty sure that Knopf isn't going to drop Charles Dickens'
R U Still Down? No matter how much you want to see more from the guy, that's it. There is no more.